The stalemate in Ivory Coast is a wound self-inflicted by over-ambitious, thoughtless and mean-spirited politicians (read Gbago, Owattara and Bedie) which has been aggravated by external meddling by the UN (read France and USA) and compounded by clumsy local handling by ECOWAS (read Nigeria and Bukina Faso).
The conflict originated when Owattara, then a former Prime Minister, attempted to seize power from the constitutional next-in-line, the then Senate President Conan Bedie. In his bid to secure power, Bedie started this "la Ivoritie" nonsense to draw attention to the fact that Owattara was of Bukina Faso parentage. It is literally means "Ivory Coast for Ivoirians only". In other words, non-Ivoirians were free to leave Ivorian soil, and they will not be missed!
Bedie continued to pursue this divisive policy after becoming President since it helped focus attention on his opponents only to face the logical backlash when the rank-and-file of the military accused him of ethnocentricity. The "boys" who were being discriminated against successfully staged a coup and installed the Army Chief-of-Staff General Gaye as Head of State.
General Gaye got funny ideas a year down the line, contested in an election he had earlier promised not to contest in, rigged the election and declared himself a civilian Head of State! He was ruthlessly assassinated within months after being "sworn-in".
Ten years ago, Lauren Gbagbo was elected by a traumatized Ivorian people as a compromise candidate to bring stability to the state, and an end to the cancer of ethnocentricity. But alas, he decided to play the very same negative political card he was elected to end: ethnocentricity! He even expanded it to include (read exclude) France and all things European!! Hence his current problems with the "UN".
Today, the UN (France and USA) are bent on driving Gbagbo out of office by force (read the blood of ECOWAS soldiers). ECOWAS (Nigeria egged on by Bukina Faso) walked into the UN trap and are now furiously back peddling now they realise that ECOWAS troops contributions will not amount to more the 2000 men from all 15 member countries (including a HQ staff of about 500!).
In short, 1500 men to fight 5000 army plus ex-thousand para-military and police Gbagbo can call up. Its would be like invading Iraq with low-tech weapons (AK47's and Somali "technicals"). Who thought this up? What kind of materiale will the UN provide to ensure the war does not drag on for years? Nuclear weapons? Under what mandate will the said troops operate? Peace-keeping or peace-enforcing?
Cooler heads have now prevailed in ECOWAS states while the hot-heads are still having a field day at the UN! How many times in its history has the UN declared war on any country over a rigged election? What about, Zimbabwe or Kenya? Will they do the same when Uganda (next week) and Nigeria (next month) have similar problems? What's so special about Ivory Coast? Who stands to gain after the blood has been shed and the dust settled?
Let the UN fight its own war, if it has the troops. Better still, let the nations who honestly believe that war will help solve the Ivorian problem (in both the UN and ECOWAS) sent their own troops there to enforce their convictions.
I am of the opinion that: 1} reforming the Ivorian electoral laws, 2} reconstituting the Electoral Commission and Constitutional Court, and 3} re-registering to electorate and re-running the election; will go a long way to resolving the mess in Ivory Coast.